Markets › Super Investors › UNION BANK OF INDIA
UI
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Bank & FIDisclosed Indian equity holdings above the 1% filing threshold.
Disclosed value
₹450 Cr
Today
+₹14.9 Cr +3.42%
Companies
5
As of
31 Mar 2026
Returns vs NIFTY current basket, 1 year
This portfolio -10.9% NIFTY 50 -4.4%behind NIFTY by 6.5 pts
Today’s disclosed holdings valued back over the past year vs the NIFTY 50, rebased to 0%. Not a record of actual trades.
Sector allocation
Portfolio X-ray
Top-5 weight
100%
Wtd P/E
25.2
Wtd ROE
3.3%
Holdings
5
By market cap
Large 0% Mid 0% Small 100%
Holdings · 5
| Company▾ | Stake▾ | Value▼ | Today▾ | Q/Q▾ | P/E▾ | ROE▾ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTL Infrastructure Ltd GTLINFRA · Telecommunication | 12.07% | ₹241.2 Cr | +4.00% | – | 2.6 | – |
| MSP Steel & Power Ltd MSPL · Capital Goods | 4.40% | ₹105.1 Cr | +1.54% | – | 70.7 | 3% |
| Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd BAJAJHIND · Fast Moving Consumer Goods | 1.86% | ₹87.5 Cr | +4.65% | – | 37.3 | 3% |
| Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd SUPREMEINF · Construction | 1.19% | ₹9.3 Cr | -0.12% | – | 0.1 | – |
| GTL Ltd GTL · Telecommunication | 4.80% | ₹6.5 Cr | +1.66% | – | 0.2 | – |
Stake history by quarter (%) increased trimmed
| Company | Mar '26 | Dec '25 | Sept '25 | Jun '25 | Mar '25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTL Infrastructure Ltd | 12.07 | 12.07 | 12.07 | 12.07 | · |
| MSP Steel & Power Ltd | 4.40 | 4.40 | 4.40 | 4.40 | · |
| Bajaj Hindusthan Sugar Ltd | 1.86 | · | · | · | · |
| Supreme Infrastructure India Ltd | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.19 | · | · |
| GTL Ltd | 4.80 | 4.80 | 4.80 | 4.80 | · |
Holdings are taken exactly as filed in public shareholding disclosures, shown only once a stake crosses the 1% disclosure threshold, so this is the holder’s large positions, not every holding. Value = disclosed shares × latest market price, so it moves daily while share counts update each quarter; “Q/Q” compares with the prior filing (pp = percentage points). Names are shown as filed and folded only for capitalisation and spacing, never different spellings; a common name could, in principle, represent more than one person. For information only, not investment advice.